{"id":1810,"date":"2025-08-15T12:22:19","date_gmt":"2025-08-15T16:22:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stsprogram.org\/sdn\/?page_id=1810"},"modified":"2025-08-27T08:27:58","modified_gmt":"2025-08-27T12:27:58","slug":"24th-annual-science-and-democracy-meeting-papers","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/stsprogram.org\/sdn\/24th-annual-science-and-democracy-meeting-papers\/","title":{"rendered":"24th Annual Science and Democracy Meeting Papers"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/stsprogram.org\/sdn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/DesiSDN-2025-License-Plate-scaled-1.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"364\" src=\"https:\/\/stsprogram.org\/sdn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/DesiSDN-2025-License-Plate-scaled-1-1024x364.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1813\" srcset=\"https:\/\/stsprogram.org\/sdn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/DesiSDN-2025-License-Plate-scaled-1-1024x364.png 1024w, https:\/\/stsprogram.org\/sdn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/DesiSDN-2025-License-Plate-scaled-1-300x107.png 300w, https:\/\/stsprogram.org\/sdn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/DesiSDN-2025-License-Plate-scaled-1-768x273.png 768w, https:\/\/stsprogram.org\/sdn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/DesiSDN-2025-License-Plate-scaled-1-1536x545.png 1536w, https:\/\/stsprogram.org\/sdn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/DesiSDN-2025-License-Plate-scaled-1-2048x727.png 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Conference participants will be emailed a password shortly before programming begins. Please submit the password via this <a href=\"https:\/\/forms.gle\/EPsvBFKR3tHjoWCH8\">form<\/a> to receive access to this year&#8217;s conference materials. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Session 1: Public Knowledge, Contested Norms<\/strong> <\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>S\u00f8ren Riis <\/strong>with Kasper Schi\u00f8lin (Roskilde University)<strong><br><\/strong><em>Researchers in Action: How Scientists Become Who They Are<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Arthur Daemmrich <\/strong>(Arizona State University)<br><em>The Normative Restructuring of Science: Gold Standard or Gilt Science?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Justin Wong <\/strong>(Harvard STS)<br><em><em>Model Technician or (Un)Witting Spy: Sovereignty and Loyalty in Science, Law, and Race<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Dan Affsprung<\/strong> (Arizona State University)<strong><br><\/strong><em>Prophets and their Problems: Threats to Accountability in AI Regulation Discourse<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Session 2: Models In and Of Governance<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Teresa Guadalupe de Le\u00f3n Escobedo<\/strong> (Universidad Nacional Aut\u00f3noma de M\u00e9xico, UNAM) <br><em>Performing new scales of climate governance through national scenarios<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Jittip Mongkolnchaiarunya <\/strong>(George Washington University)<br><em>Epistemic Exclusion in Climate Science: Why We Grow the Wrong Trees in the Wrong Places<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Irina Kalinka<\/strong> (Columbia University)<br><em>From \u2018Mere\u2019 Neutral Facilitators to \u2018Socially-Responsible\u2019 Governing Powers? The Rise of Tech-Corporate Governmentality<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Lisa Claussmann<\/strong> with Brice Laurent (Centre de Sociologie de l\u2019Innovation, Mines Paris-PSL)<br><em>The trouble with purity: making carbon matter<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Session 3: Expertise, Progress and the Public Good<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Jeroen Oomen<\/strong> (Utrecht University)<br><em>Captured Futures: Rethinking the Drama of Environmental Politics<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Henry Austin<\/strong> (Harvard STS)<br><em>Subjects of Progress: Innovation and Configuring the Public Good<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Lou Lennad<\/strong> (Harvard STS)<br><em><em>Behavioral science for public policy in the Anglo-American imaginary<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Sebastian Pfotenhauer<\/strong> with Brice Laurent (Technical University of Munich)<br><em>States of Exceptions: Innovation experiments, public reason, and the re-making of the common good<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong><strong>Session 4: Technological Futures and the Politics of Prediction<\/strong><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>T.J. Foley<\/strong> with Sascha Meinrath (McQuillan Institute for Science, Technology and the Human Future)<br><em>Predicting Power: Antitrust Law and the Constitutional Right to a Competitive Economic Order<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Alberto Aparicio<\/strong> (University of Texas Medical Branch)<br><em>Regulatory Testbeds for Future Making: Longevity, Governance, and the New Frontier of Innovation<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Alexander Wentland<\/strong> (Technical University of Munich)<br><em>Between Microchips and Memory: Spectral Imaginaries and Lost Futures in Europe\u2019s Largest Microchip Hub<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Conor McGlynn<\/strong> (Harvard STS)<br><em>The Problem of the Future in AI Safety<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Session 5: Developmentalism Revisited &#8211; Views from the South<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Seongkyung Lee<\/strong> (University of Southern California)<br><em>Developmentalism, Technocracy, and Democracy in the Age of AI: South Korea&#8217;s Dilemma<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Aishani Aatresh<\/strong> (University of Oxford)<br><em>By and For the People? Comparing Regional Vaccine Production in India and Senegal<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Pariroo Rattan<\/strong> (Harvard STS)<br><em>Problematizing Privacy and Surveillance from the Streets of Delhi<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Anna M. Agathangelou<\/strong> (York University)<br><em>Digital Capitalism, Development and Democracy and the Global South<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong><strong>Session 6: Constitutionalism Beyond Borders: Technopolitics in a Global World<\/strong>&nbsp;<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Hadrien Macq<\/strong> (SPIRAL &#8211; University of Li\u00e8ge)<br><em>Towards a constitutional approach to digital urban governance: Urban Digital Twins and the mutual constitution of problems, publics, and institutions<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Leyatt Betre<\/strong> (Princeton University)<br><em>A Tale of Two Treaties: International Law and the Technopolitics of Nuclear War Effects Research&nbsp;<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Margo Boenig-Liptsin<\/strong> (ETH Z\u00fcrich)<br><em>\u201cI don&#8217;t want to live in a society that does these sorts of things\u201d: Digital constitutionalism seen through the life of Edward Snowden<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Kaushik Sunder Rajan<\/strong> (University of Chicago)<br><em>Ethical Plateaus of Remedy and Redistribution: Injury, Law and Postapartheid Bioconstitutionalism<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong><strong>Session 7: The Political Work of Representation<\/strong><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Christopher Lawrence<\/strong><em> <\/em>(Georgetown University)&nbsp;<br><em>Muscle Memories of Revelation: Extending the Imaginative Exercise<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Makoto Takahashi<\/strong><em> <\/em>(Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)<br><em>Curating \u201cfrom an STS perspective\u201d: Representing the nuclear as co-creator, counter-expert, and collider<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Rose Sebastian<\/strong> (Bharata Mata College)<br><em>Narrativizing the nation through science and technology: Instances from Indian science museums<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Ben Hurlbut<\/strong> (Arizona State University)<br><em>The same river: how biotechnology represents progress&nbsp;<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Conference participants will be emailed a password shortly before programming begins. Please submit the password via this form to receive access to this year&#8217;s conference materials. Session 1: Public Knowledge, Contested Norms S\u00f8ren Riis with Kasper Schi\u00f8lin (Roskilde University)Researchers in Action: How Scientists Become Who They Are Arthur Daemmrich (Arizona State University)The Normative Restructuring of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":591,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1810","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","post"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stsprogram.org\/sdn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1810","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stsprogram.org\/sdn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stsprogram.org\/sdn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stsprogram.org\/sdn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/591"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stsprogram.org\/sdn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1810"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/stsprogram.org\/sdn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1810\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1838,"href":"https:\/\/stsprogram.org\/sdn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1810\/revisions\/1838"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stsprogram.org\/sdn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1810"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}